Music, IT & Human Rights since 2005

Crime, Faith and Belief, NJN

Jehovah’s Witness perform ritual circumcision on 4 year old

JW dad convicted for botched circumcision on son

A BC man was convicted of criminal negligence causing bodily harm when he tried to circumcise his four year old son.

He told the court he learned how to perform a circumcision on the Internet.

“The bizarre case centered on a battle over the religious freedoms of the former Jehovah’s Witness, who was trying to follow a literal interpretation of the Bible after a series of misfortunes hit his family.” CBC

Jehovah’s Witnesses believe in the literal interpretation of the bible. This extends to risking their lives and their children when they refuse blood transfusions. That doctrine is a based on the Jewish command not to “eat” blood.

The man circumcised himself first. “His first attempt to circumcise himself ended up with his foreskin turning black and only part of it cut off. When he couldn’t stop the bleeding, he called an ambulance, and a doctor in a hospital emergency room ended up stitching up the bleeding wound.” CBC

Doctors and rabbis had refused to perform the operation on the boy. The father thought the procedure would purify his family in a ritualistic worship of Jehovah.

He did the procedure himself and used a horse medication called Wonder Dust.

The man was a practicing Jehovah’s Witness and was defended in court by well-known human rights lawyer Doug Christie. Christie said they might appeal the charges since it constituted freedom of religion.

Related story – Jehovahs Witnesses whisk children away from the law

The appalling story

The man testified in court that, after the boy consented to the circumcision, he fed him some mead — a biblical beverage made from honey — lay him on the kitchen floor, stretched his penis across a cutting board and cut off part of the foreskin.

When asked in court whether the man used ice to ease the boy’s pain, he replied, “Where would the Israelites have found ice?”

He then applied the Wonder Dust, gave the boy some ice cream and told him he could watch whatever movies he wanted that week, before heading off to church, leaving the boy in the care of his mother, who could not stand the sight of blood.

The boy spent the next few days walking with his legs wide apart, until a social worker, who caught wind of the operation, brought two police officers to the house to take the boy into protective custody for a medical examination.

After the medical staff found the boy’s penis coated in a thick cap of black tarry substance from the Wonder Dust, they decided to remove the rest of the family’s children from the home.

Logically the judge ruled the child could not have consented to the procedure due to his age. “Indeed his motivations could be characterized as selfish or even deluded insofar as he believed that he was unable to live in his home at Passover with any uncircumcised male, including his four-year-old son,” CBC
Meanwhile, a surgeon removed “a beehive coating” from the boy’s penis before properly circumcising him, saying later in court that the boy would likely have ended up with a disfigured penis had the operation not been completed. CBC

This is not the only case of a religious fanatic circumcising a child. A Morganton, NC man was convicted on September 29, 2009 of the same procedure without the benefit of anesthetic or proper medical assistance.

“The main reason I did it was, the Holy Spirit pressed me to do it,” he said.

11 Comments

  1. Whyohwhy

    What the??

    You know damn well JW’s don’t practice or even encourage circumcision, period! He clearly was not following JW teachings and clearly didn’t receive instruction from them to do this.

    Wow. Just wow.

  2. Comment by post author

    Stephen Pate

    Not true. They do encourage it. Christie claims the man was following his religion – Jehovah’s Witness – albeit a little less intelligently than some. Fundamentalist religions tend to spawn simply minded adherence to ancient customs as more likely to please God.

  3. tom sheepandgoats

    Your source itself says the fellow was a “former Jehovah’s Witness.” Why does the headline indicate otherwise? Former members of anything do things not in harmony with their former affiliation. Sometimes that’s the reason they are ‘former.’

    Christie’s the lawyer, isn’t he? Trying to defend his client any way he knows how? Whyohwhy is right. (and it’s a bit hard to believe that you wouldn’t know this)

  4. Comment by post author

    Stephen Pate

    Christie used the JW religion defense and the media picked it up. Knowing the fringe element JW’s as I do, these are not intelligent people. They are struggling to prove to God something beyond common sense. The guy circumcised himself and then that didn’t get him closer to God at the annual celebration of the Last Supper, he cut the 4 year old.

  5. Whyohwhy

    Really? JWs encourage it? No they decidedly do not. Either you are so far removed that you don’t remember or you are lying to sensationalize the story. Period.

  6. Whyohwhy

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_Jehovah's_Witnesses_practice_circumcision

    Also, you are twisting the story. The lawyer defending him is doing so on the (flawed) concept of freedom of religion: THE RELIGION THIS MAN PRACTICES. He is not practicing JW faith, period. That is made clear in the article.

  7. Comment by post author

    Stephen Pate

    The link says nothing about circumcision. JW doctrine floats along like a cork on the surface of life. I don’t think a life sentence of being a JW is worth knowing the twists and turns HQ takes. When is the world ending now?

  8. Whyohwhy

    Your comment box doesn’t allow for long links it appears. A simple cut and paste of the link into a new browser works fine.

  9. Whyohwhy

    Ok you’ve clearly lost it. The link has the question embedded right in it!

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_Jehovah's_Witnesses_practice_circumcision

    The first 3 paragraphs outline the biblical reason why they do not practice circumcision. The last one outright states the official position.

    QUOTE: “Jehovah’s Witnesses do not practice literal circumcision for religious reasons. If a parent makes an individual choice to have their male child circumcised, for health or other personal reasons, that is their individual decision to make.”

  10. S. Fisher

    You stay true to your name, “Not Just the News.” Obviously, you include lots of garbage, as well. Anyone with a brain can go to the official website for Jehovah’s Witnesses to find out their beliefs. I actually find it somewhat humorous that some people would believe that circumcision is a matter decided by the witness organization. It is a private matter, period. In regards to your article, how sad that someone would do that to their child. Certainly, conditions in the world are going from bad to worse.

  11. really ticked

    oh…

    so the surgeon “properly” amputated the poor victims prepuce, following the the “religous” fathers mutilation efforts and attack!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.