Tag Archives: sexually inappropriate

Serena Williams another sensation at Kingdom Hall

Controversial tennis star looking for attention from Jehovah’s Witnesses with ESPN cover

Serena Williams ESPN Magazine Nude Cover Serena Williams another sensation at Kingdom Hall photo

Serena Williams

“you can take Serena out of Compton but u cant take the Compton out of Serena.

She showed her ass ON the court, now she’s showing her ass OFF the court. LITERALLY!

Is this sum kinda peace offering 4 da fans 4 threat’n the line judge?

Wuts next, Playboy? Video HOE’n? Tiger hit the BILLION DOLLA mark & ain’t even take a dayum shirt off. U got talent, money, fame/fortune…WTF?

Common aint givin yo ass NO ATTENTION?! Shout-out to Kindom Hall. Come & get your Jehovah’s Witness cause she’s ova here backsliding…BUTTNAKED!” Average.bro.com

ESPN will hit the newsstands tomorrow with a bold cover of Serena Williams in her black, almost nude glory.  Continue reading

Privacy Commissioner Rules in Favour of Disabled, Against Government

CBC+News+at+6+Jan+10+07+Karen+Rose Privacy Commissioner Rules in Favour of Disabled, Against Government photo PEI’s Acting Information and Privacy Commissioner ruled this week that the Department of Social Services and Seniors may no longer use the Disability Support Program Screening Tool. Karen Rose, acting Commissioner, in a 26 page Order said “The use by the Public Body (Department of Social Services and Seniors) of the Non-Function Questions in the DSP Screening Tool violates Part II of the Freedom and Information and Protection of Privacy Act…”

CBC+News+at+6+Jan+10+07+3 Privacy Commissioner Rules in Favour of Disabled, Against Government photo “This is a great day for Islanders living with disabilities,” said Stephen Pate the complainant. “We finally got rid of the DSP Screening Tool which was used to abuse Islanders not help them.”

On December 6, 2006, Stephen Pate a director of PEI Disability Alert filed a complaint against the use of 42 questions contained in the Screening Tool. Pate contended that 70% of the information collected by the DSP was personal in nature and excluded by the Protection of Privacy Act.

CBC carried this story on the News at Six (shown on the right)

The Department of Social Services and Seniors responded that it need the information to administer the program. Evidence showed that DSP employees were not administering the questionnaire at all times. Therefore the Acting Commissioner ruled the questions were not necessary and therefore outside the law.

Some of the questions asked by the Screening Tool that Pate objected to were “Are you self-abusive?” and “Are you sexually inappropriate?

“The DSP is long overdue for a thorough review and reform,” said Pate. “The Liberals announced this review and reform in their election platform. Now is the time to begin the process. 19,000 Islanders living with disabilities are looking to the government for relief. Getting rid of the DSP Screening Tool is one step in the process,” added Pate.

In a separate ruling, the PEI Human Rights Commission ruled in June that the DSP Screening Tool was inappropriate for children. The government announced it would seek a replacement.

On August 22nd 2007, Sharon Cameron the Deputy Minister of Social Services and Seniors wrote the Acting Privacy Commissioner that the Department was no longer using the screening tool.

Acting Privacy Commissioner Rose acknowledged the Department had discontinued use of the screening tool. She further recommended that any replacement tool “undergo a comprehensive Privacy Impact Assessment prior to …implementation.”

PEI Disability Alert is a not-for-profit group providing advocacy support to Islanders with disabilities.

Disabled have rights to privacy too

egLogo+copy Disabled have rights to privacy too photoMarch 28th, 2007
THE EDITOR

The Province of PEI wants to track the sex lives of Islanders with disabilities. Every year they ask at least 1,100 people with a disability ‘Are you sexually inappropriate?’

There is no legitimate reason for this prurient question. The people asking the question are not doctors, nurses, psychologists or psychiatrists. They are even asking pre-pubescent children this question or at least their parents.

If you apply to the PEI government for your driver’s license, they don’t ask about sex. If you go to any PEI hospital for treatment, they don’t ask you about your sex life. You don’t get asked this question anywhere like financial assistance, or highways, or property tax, or agriculture.

All the government departments have no interest whatsoever in your sex life, other than the Disability Support Program. They want to know so bad they will refuse to give you a wheelchair or a walker unless you tell them the answer.

Three groups of parents filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission on this question. We filled a Privacy Commissioner complaint too. CBC TV covered the story with other media and you’d think that would be the end of it.

Oh no, when the Province has a prurient interest in your sex life, they don’t give up easy. In the Social Service and Seniors filing with the Privacy Commissioner, the DSP says “each question has some unique purpose, to determine the severity of the disability’. They go onto to state the sex question ‘indicate a clients understanding of what is socially acceptable…’ That’s just baloney for ‘we want to know’.

When did Islanders with disabilities become sex criminals or incompetent wards of the state? We are free people whose privacy and independence is being invaded by the Province.

I racked my brain trying to figure out the reason they want the sex information. Why do government officials want to know about the sex lives of Islanders with disabilities? Is it to satisfy secret sexual fantasies? Is that why they pick on the weak, the disabled to ask these questions?

There is a fetish called Abasiophilia ‘a psychosexual attraction to disabled people. Is the reason the Province wants to ask these questions, someone has a fetish?

What other reasons are there for this gross invasion of Privacy and Human Rights? We should petition to move DSP to Highways. They seem like nicer people.

Ed: this was published earlier in a longer version as
Sex lives of the disabled

Baba’s Open Mic

Rock+on+Poster+Smaller Babas Open Mic photo
I was glad to get back to Baba’s Open Mic last night. Holidays and a post-Christmas cold/flu had taken their toll in missed weeks.

It’s always a humbling and fun experience to play there.

Steve was reminiscing about how fantastic the Rock On! Live Jam had been at Piazza Joe’s. Guys shredding Pantera next to sensitive singer songwriters.

As I started my first song, Todd King asked out loud if the song was inappropriate sexually. I refused to answer the question!

One of my own songs went over like awful but Leopard Skin Pillbox Hat had them rocking. Mahoney was doing great backup work on his Taylor for me. We should practice: we might get better.

Andrea was telling me more about her trip across Canada with Moe taking videos. It’s supposed to happen in March/April. That will be such a cool trip for them. In you see Andrea, buy one of her CD’s to help her with trip expenses.

PEI Privacy Commissioner Investigating Complaint

The PEI Information and Privacy Commissioner opened an investigation against the PEI Department of Social Services and Seniors.

Sexually inappropriate PEI Privacy Commissioner Investigating Complaint photo

PEI Disability Support Program wants to know about our sex life

The Department violated the PEI Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act by collecting unnecessary personal and disability information in the Disability Support Program.

The DSP screening tool asks 60 questions but only uses 18 questions in its evaluation. Karen Rose, Acting Information and Privacy Commissioner, has given the Province until January 26, 2007 to respond to the complaint.

The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act prohibits the Government from collecting personal information about health or disability unless it is necessary for the operation of the public organization. Health information, for example, collected when one is undergoing healthcare treatments is allowed. Non-related information about disability when applying for a job or permit is not allowed.  Continue reading