Donna Jodhan’s inspiring triumph on the eve of the United Nations’ International Day of Persons with Disabilities
From NUPGE – Ottawa – On the eve of Dec. 3, the United Nations’ International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD), Canadians with disabilities have won a major victory in ensuring that government information becomes more accessible for people with sight impairment.
Earlier this week the Federal Court of Canada released a landmark decision concerning the right of Canadians with disabilities to access government websites.
Justice Michael Kelen ruled that the Canadian government must post key website content in a usable format for blind and partially-sighted Canadians.
This victory is the result of the courageous and persistent actions of blind activist Donna Jodhan.
Justice Kelen concluded the government breached Jodhan’s equality rights by its “system-wide failure” to provide the same services to the visually impaired as it does to those who can see.
“She has been denied equal access to, and benefit from, government information and services provided online to the public on the Internet and this constitutes discrimination against her on the basis of her physical disability, namely that she is blind,” wrote Justice Kelen. Continue reading →
License agreements that absolve software developers of responsibility found unenforceable
A recent decision of the UK High Court held that software developers are responsible for software bugs. This goes against most software license agreements that software companies force on customers. Essentially, software companies have been denying all responsibility for damages.
The license agreements are non-negotiable documents often consented to as software is being installed.
It’s been the software industry practice to admit that software is buggy. People know that and hundreds of millions of customers have accepted it for decades.
However, all goods are sold on the basis of “fit for the purpose intended.” The UK High Court ruled that license agreements can’t eliminate the basic rules of commerce. Continue reading →
Police criminal investigation outweighs confidential press privilege in Chrétien affair
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the National Post must turn over evidence it received from their journalist’s confidential source in the “Grand Mere Affair.”
The Supreme Court ruled that any privilege is not constitutional and must be balanced by the need to investigate criminal activity.
“…evidence sought to be obtained measured against the public interest in respecting the journalist’s promise of confidentiality…Therefore, no journalist can give a secret source an absolute assurance of confidentiality.” Supreme Court of Canada
The case had 16 interveners including CBC, Bell Globe Media, two provinces and the Federal government, civil liberties and various journalist associations. Continue reading →
Just when we get freedom of speech on the Internet, someone tries to take it away
The Supreme Court of Canada is getting ready to hear the case of Wayne Crookes, a former fund-raiser and organizer for the BC Green Party.
Crookes took offense at alleged derogatory remarks made about him on several websites including Open Politics.ca
That’s the nature of the web, people say the rudest things, some of them nasty and perhaps defamatory. They do it anonymously. In the US, the web site and host can rely on safe-harbor provisions of the CDA (Communications Decency Act). “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” Section 230
Canada doesn’t have the same provisions although journalists are protected from defamation lawsuits when they report the facts they know. Continue reading →
If the partial settlement wasn’t bad enough, the court has rejected that deal as preferential over other debt holders while politicians ponder
The inequity of a legal system that can reward executives with millions of dollars in bonuses while forcing pensioners with disabilities onto welfare was backed by the Ontario Super Court as the Nortel $57 million pension agreement was thrown out.
That agreement which only lasted until the end of 2010 has been thrown out by a judge as prejudicial to other creditors. Once again the legal system has prejudice the employees in favor of executives and bankers.
While the Harper Conservative government talks and promises to reform Canada’s pension system, they are marking time with no laws that could save these employees. This is a travesty in Canada that the recession and it’s aftermath has made urgent. The Tories fiddle while Canadian employees take the heat.
The Opposition NDP and Liberals could force the minority government’s hand on this issue. Is their talk supporting pension reform mere political rhetoric, just another bluff from Jack Layton and Michael Ignatieff?